THE TECH SHOULD STILL EXIST

Keep the possibility.
Question the permission.

Wise begins with a belief that public-safety camera technology can be valuable—and that its potential for abuse deserves just as much attention.

Start with the boundaries

BOTH THINGS CAN BE TRUE

Care about safety.
Care about civil liberties.

Finding a missing child or recovering a stolen vehicle is a compelling goal. It still leaves difficult questions about who can search, what is retained, and how access is checked.

The ambition is to preserve useful, justified capabilities while designing limits around them. The evidence should guide that discussion—not replace it with an easy answer.

Consider the potential for misuse

THE EVIDENCE / UNITED STATES

Leave room for the facts.

Statistics will be added once the source, time period, and meaning of each measure have been checked. No numerical claims are published here yet.

US kidnapping

A clearly defined US measure, with a reporting year and source. Missing-person reports and kidnappings must not be treated as interchangeable.

Placeholder · Source and reporting year pending

AMBER Alerts

Official US alert and recovery figures, with definitions and reporting period. Recovery alone does not establish that a camera caused it.

Placeholder · Source and reporting year pending

Vehicle recovery

US stolen-vehicle and recovery measures, distinguishing general recovery data from outcomes attributable to camera technology.

Placeholder · Source and reporting year pending

Related public-safety outcomes

Evidence about where camera-assisted investigations help, where they fall short, and what the available data cannot establish.

Placeholder · Source and reporting year pending

THE NEXT QUESTION

What should the system
be allowed to remember?

Explore the Wise approach